When Link Building Goes Wrong: 8 Link Building Practices to Avoid

As the head of a business, you know it is important for your current and potential customers to be able to find you when they run an internet search. You also have heard of connecting the content on your website through link building; however, you’re not sure where to start. The most important part of link building is understanding what you can do and what you can’t do (without penalty). Knowing what NOT to do can sometimes be more helpful than knowing what you should do.

                                    
Why is knowing what not to do more important? Making a mistake when you’re building links can result in a Google penalty (…in which your website becomes negatively ranked). Nevertheless, if you’re able to avoid mistakes, you can protect the hard work, time and effort you’ve put into building your website.

Paid Links

Linking to your content is important; however, you should not pay sites for permission to link. Doing so will just waste your hard-earned money. In addition, paying for links can end up hurting your Google ranking. Instead, you should consider using our Premium Content Initiative (PCI). Continue reading here for more information on PCI content.

Abusing Press Releases

Press releases work to release good, solid information about a product or service to public. However, spammers abuse this method by releasing information (filled with random links to their blog) that is not newsworthy. For more information about creating successful press releases, read our blog on Press Release Optimization.

Spammy Guest Blogging

Guest blogging is one of the more recent ways Google will negatively rank your website. However, only poorly written content from low ranked websites is bad. Practicing genuine guest blogging (…or “relationship building” as explained here) is fine, and if done correctly (i.e. providing well-written content on a relevant site), can boost your Google ranking.

Quantity over Quality

Rather than trying to produce as many blogs and websites (with as many links as you can shove in), focus on producing solid content (you can find suggestions for creating great content here). Otherwise, you’ll risk being labeled as a spammer.

Keyword Stuffing

When using keywords, they should fit organically in your content. Including keywords in your content is important; however, avoid using so many keywords that your content no longer makes sense. By reading 11 Tips to Increasing Keyword Saturation while Maintaining Valuable Content, you can learn how to add more keywords into your content without risking a Google penalty.

Overdoing Social Profile Links

While using social media networks is a great way to build links back to your website or blog, you need to be careful using them. You should only create a few at a time and you should get to know those you are interacting. Do not just start posting links.

Ignoring Social Media

On the other hand, don’t simply ignore social media. Just make sure you take the time to learn how to use it properly.

Check out 9 Do’s and Don’ts of Building a Social Bookmarking Network for suggestions on how to best use social media for your business.

Not Tracking Progress

You should always track your website traffic to know exactly where your visitors are coming from—and many websites will offer you tracking codes to use. One example is Google Analytics, which will track your traffic for you. Tracking your traffic will let you know what is working for your website and what needs to be fixed to bring in more traffic.

While it can take time to learn all of the ins and outs of link building, the results are worth it. For more information on successful link building practices, we invite you to continue browsing our blog.

SEO Roundup: September 12, 2014


As a content developer myself, I admit I may have somewhat of a conflict of interest in preaching about the importance of creating quality web content in your SEO strategy, but at least I’m not alone in my conviction. A newly released Google search rankings study from SearchMetrics has declared that quality content creation is “no longer an addition to, but is the main focus of, SEO.” And they’ve got data to back it up.

It shouldn’t be all that surprising then that content marketing topics seemed to be all the rage this week. From getting in touch with your funny side to discovering the voice of the customer, take a few minutes to check out these helpful links on rethinking your content marketing strategy, as well as these other well-written articles and SEO updates from around the web.
Content Marketing:
Need a good laugh? Your audience does, too. This comical article shows how injecting a little bit of humor into dull content can make your articles and blogs a lot more memorable.
Our friends over at Positionly reveal what separates the great writers from the rest. Here’s a hint: it has nothing to do with writing itself.
Also from Positionly, find out the key ingredients of sharable content and some surprising examples of blog post failures
Take the guessing game out of great landing page copy by checking out this guide to identifying the voice of your customers.
Social Media:
Facebook and Twitter may dominate the social media world, but how long will they stay on top? Browse through this list to find some recognizable and obscure emerging social networks to keep an eye on.
If you use Twitter as part of your social media strategy, a controversial proposed change may impact your hard work. For better or worse? You decide.
Google:
Google’s John Mueller hinted on Google Hangout that the he expects a new and improved Penguin to be rolled out within the 2014 year – the first major update in almost a year. A Google Christmas gift for SEOs, perhaps?
Google has introduced several new, long-awaited features within the Webmaster Tools API to bring it up to par with other API’s.

Google Writes Off Authorship

Three years ago Google announced authorship to eliminate spam and duplicate content, and offer high quality content created by a niche and industry authority in search results. It seemed the search giant intended for people populating web properties with content to play a pivotal role in how Google treated search results. After all, they bombarded us with multiple videos on how to use authorship markup on websites. They also added features, like Google Plus circle counts, and authorship impression data to Webmaster Tools. Google seemed to value authorship more and more as time went on.
I was among the SEO professionals who scrambled to build a Google+ account, post an author photo and bio so that I could be visible in Google search results and achieve the best ranking. Now, Google has terminated authorship, leaving many SEOs and webmasters perplexed.

Was it a ploy to get more Google+ users? It’s a valid question—after all, how many of us spent time creating a Google+ profile with high hopes that our content would rank higher in search results? Our efforts, alas, may have been in vain.

When authorship commenced, Google’s Matt Cutts said that Google was attempting to find the authorities in niche topic areas and industries; done algorithmically not by humans.

“Because you know you really want to listen to the experts in each area if you can,” he said.

Last fall, Cutts announced the amount of authorship in search results would be reduced by approximately 15 percent. The move would improve quality, he claimed.

Google stated in June it was getting rid of authors’ profile photos and circle counts in authorship results because it would lend to a “better mobile experience and a more consistent design across devices.”

Nonetheless, search results still displayed a byline and link to the author’s Google+ profile.

In August, Google’s John Mueller announced authorship would no longer appear in search results because the information wasn’t as useful to users as Google had hoped.

How can knowing more about a result be less useful? It is odd that within one year Google went from considering authorship information crucial to finding it utterly useless.

Mueller emphasized that removing authorship won’t greatly affect traffic to sites, but you have to wonder. A silver lining is that although authorship is eliminated, “author rank” still existents.

Google uses author rank in the In-Depth Articles section and possibly in terms of typical organic search results.

Now, Google search result delivery favors knowledge graph—on-page “answers”—more than it does people and links to other websites. The company says its goal “is to eventually provide immediate answers to specific questions for the most popular search queries.”

How do you feel about Google doing away with authorship? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Measuring SEO Performance After "Not Provided"

In recent years, the biggest change to the search landscape happened when Google chose to withhold keyword data from webmasters. At SEOBook, Aaron noticed and wrote about the change, as evermore keyword data disappeared.

The motivation to withold this data, according to Google, was privacy concerns:


SSL encryption on the web has been growing by leaps and bounds. As part of our commitment to provide a more secure online experience, today we announced that SSL Search on https://www.google.com will become the default experience for signed in users on google.com.

At first, Google suggested it would only affect a single-digit percentage of search referral data:


Google software engineer Matt Cutts, who’s been involved with the privacy changes, wouldn’t give an exact figure but told me he estimated even at full roll-out, this would still be in the single-digit percentages of all Google searchers on Google.com

...which didn't turn out to be the case. It now affects almost all keyword referral data from Google.

Was it all about privacy? Another rocket over the SEO bows? Bit of both? Probably. In any case, the search landscape was irrevocably changed. Instead of being shown the keyword term the searcher had used to find a page, webmasters were given the less than helpful “not provided”. This change rocked SEO. The SEO world, up until that point, had been built on keywords. SEOs choose a keyword. They rank for the keyword. They track click-thrus against this keyword. This is how many SEOs proved their worth to clients.

These days, very little keyword data is available from Google. There certainly isn’t enough to keyword data to use as a primary form of measurement.
Rethinking Measurement

This change forced a rethink about measurement, and SEO in general. Whilst there is still some keyword data available from the likes of Webmaster Tools & the AdWords paid versus organic report, keyword-based SEO tracking approaches are unlikely to align with Google’s future plans. As we saw with the Hummingbird algorithm, Google is moving towards searcher-intent based search, as opposed to keyword-matched results.


Hummingbird should better focus on the meaning behind the words. It may better understand the actual location of your home, if you’ve shared that with Google. It might understand that “place” means you want a brick-and-mortar store. It might get that “iPhone 5s” is a particular type of electronic device carried by certain stores. Knowing all these meanings may help Google go beyond just finding pages with matching words

The search bar is still keyword based, but Google is also trying to figure out what user intent lays behind the keyword. To do this, they’re relying on context data. For example, they look at what previous searches has the user made, their location, they are breaking down the query itself, and so on, all of which can change the search results the user sees.

When SEO started, it was in an environment where the keyword the user typed into a search bar was exact matching that with a keyword that appears on a page. This is what relevance meant. SEO continued with this model, but it’s fast becoming redundant, because Google is increasingly relying on context in order to determine searcher intent & while filtering many results which were too aligned with the old strategy. Much SEO has shifted from keywords to wider digital marketing considerations, such as what the visitor does next, as a result.

Expert Insights On The Future Of SEO, Part 1


SEO is an ever-evolving art, as search engines are constantly changing things up in an effort to improve the searcher experience. In our first installment of this series, industry thought leaders discussed where SEO is headed next year, in 2015. Today, they share their predictions for 2020.

How Will We Practice SEO In 2020, And How Will It Differ From The Way We Do It Today?



Aleyda Solis



At the pace at which search evolves, a lot can happen in six years. Some things that might be different, vastly improved or more ubiquitous include:
Search engines functionalities and capabilities (semantic and conversational search)
Ranking factors (social endorsement)
Devices (mobile, wearables)
Interfaces (voice search)
Formats (apps)
Platforms (maybe other, more evolved search engines that establish a different search paradigm?)

All of the above might change, and we SEOs will need different tools, technical abilities, tactics and strategies as a result. But the “core” and goal of our job will be the same: to grow and maximize the organic search visibility of our clients’ online presences to connect with their target audience so they can achieve their conversion goals. It will be crucial to consider these goals and principles with the existing “search ecosystem” in 2020 to make the most out of it.

The Big List of SEO Tips and Tricks for Using HTTPS on Your Website


It's rare that Google reveals any of its actual ranking factors, so it came as a big surprise when representativesannounced they would reward sites using HTTPS encryption with a boost in search results.

HTTPS isn't like other ranking factors. Implementing it requires complexity, risks, and costs. Webmasters balance this out with benefits that include increased security, better referral data, and a possible boost in rankings.

Google's push for HTTPS adoption appears to be working. A recent Moz Poll found 24% of webmasters planning to make the switch.


SEO advantages of switching to HTTPS



In addition to the security offered by HTTPS (which we'll discuss below) there are additional SEO benefits for marketers to take advantage of.
1. More referrer data

Whenever traffic passes from a secure HTTPS site to a non-secure HTTP site, the referral data gets stripped away. This traffic shows up in your analytics report as 'Direct.' This is a problem because you don't know where the traffic actually comes from.

If you use HTTP, traffic from sites like Hacker News shows up as 'direct', because Hacker News uses HTTPS.

Fortunately, there's a simple solution: when traffic passes to an HTTPS site, the secure referral information is preserved. This holds true whether the original site uses HTTP or HTTPS.

As more and more sites make the switch, this becomes increasingly important.
2. HTTPS as a rankings boost

On one hand, Google has confirmed the ranking boost of HTTPS. On the other hand, with over 200 ranking, it's likely you'll find the effect of any ranking influence to remain quiet small.

In fact, a recent study by Search Metrics showed no detectable advantage to sites using HTTPS.

Like most ranking signals, it is very hard to isolate on its own.

In fact, don't expect HTTPS to act as a silver bullet. If rankings are your only concern, there are likely dozens of thingsyou can do that will have a bigger impact. Here are several:

AdSense User Loses $46,000 to Google Punishment

Idris Sami, 19, is a French-Moroccan entrepreneur who created a website called MesTextos that allows French-speakers to text for free. It’s a great thing for people who don’t use a cell phone or don’t want mobile data costs. Alternative messaging services are popular in Europe, so Sami’s niche business is fantastic.

Sami’s website was using Google’s AdSense system. AdSense allows webmasters to display Google powered search ads and get a percentage of the revenues.

So many users were clicking on MesTextos’ ads that by December 2013 Sami’s Google account had earned a whopping $46,000!

But as an AdSense partner, if you don’t use ads on your site exactly as Google instructs, you will be severely punished.
Punished and Banned By Google

Google returned Sami’s $46,000 to advertisers and banned him from ad programs until further notice.

Business Insider reports that Google told Sami in an email that it is against the rules for MesTextos to force visitors to click on ads to access the site. Sami denies that he did anything wrong, and claims that two different Google sales representatives emailed him praise for his AdSense efforts and offered to improve his site’s SEO. He says he didn’t know something was wrong until he was banned.

A Google spokesperson told the Business Insider that Google always notifies the publisher explaining which policy was breached and often gives them a chance to correct pages so the account remains in good standing. Publishers can also appeal policy decisions.

Sami is working with an attorney to demand the money he believes he earned while using Google’s AdSense, according to Business Insider.
Google Sued in the U.S.

Sami’s case is not unique. Google is presently being sued in the U.S. over allegations that it defrauded thousands of website publishers of ad money. In numerous instances web publishers complain that Google withholds ad money without explanation.

Google clearly does not ban successful sites—doing so would the search behemoth poorer. We know Google collects revenues only when it delivers those advertisements.

So, what’s going on?

Google claims it cannot explain publicly how it detects click fraud or bad behavior because revealing too much would help wrongdoers. That’s understandable, but it is a source of frustration for Google’s clients who may not know their sites are being used for fake traffic.

The outcome of Sami’s lawsuit and others may finally reveal precisely how and why Google kicks websites out of its $60 billion-a-year advertising empire.